Recent estimates of climate evolution over the coming century still differ by several degrees. This uncertainty motivates the work presented here. There are two basic approaches to apprehend the complexity of climate change: deterministically nonlinear and stochastically linear, i.e., the Lorenz and the Hasselmann approach. The grand unification of these two approaches relies on the theory of random dynamical systems. We apply this theory to study the random attractors of nonlinear, stochastically perturbed climate models. Doing so allows one to examine the interaction of internal climate variability with the forcing, whether natural or anthropogenic, and to take into account the climate system's non-equilibrium behavior in determining climate sensitivity. This non-equilibrium behavior is due to a combination of nonlinear and random effects. We give here a unified treatment of such effects from the point of view of the theory of dynamical systems and of their bifurcations. Energy balance models are used to illustrate multiple equilibria, while multi-decadal oscillations in the thermohaline circulation illustrate the transition from steady states to periodic behavior. Random effects are introduced in the setting of random dynamical systems, which permit a unified treatment of both nonlinearity and stochasticity. The combined treatment of nonlinear and random effects is applied to a stochastically perturbed version of the classical Lorenz convection model. Climate sensitivity is then defined mathematically as the derivative of an appropriate functional or other function of the system’s state with respect to the bifurcation parameter. This definition is illustrated by using numerical results for a model of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation. The concept of a hierarchy of models is the thread that runs across this chapter, and the robustness of elementary bifurcations across such a hierarchy is emphasized.

# Review & Encyclopedia

A mathematical theory of climate sensitivity or, How to deal with both anthropogenic forcing and natural variability?. In: Climate Change: Multidecadal and Beyond. World Scientific Publ. Co./Imperial College Press ; 2015. pp. 31–51.Abstract

.
Low-frequency variability of the large-scale ocean circulation: a dynamical systems approach. Reviews of Geophysics. 2005;43.Abstract

.
Hilbert problems for the geosciences in the 21st century. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics. 2001;8 (4/5) :211–211.

.
Solving problems with GCMs: General circulation models and their role in the climate modeling hierarchy. In: General Circulation Model Development: Past, Present and Future. Academic Press, San Diego ; 2000. pp. 285–325.

.
Extreme events: dynamics, statistics and prediction. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics. 2011;18 (3) :295–350.Abstract

Intraseasonal oscillations in the mid-latitudes: observations, theory, and GCM results, in Proceedings ECMWF/CLIVAR Workshop on Simulation and Prediction of Intra-Seasonal Variability with Emphasis on the MJO. ; 2003 :3–6.

.
Geophysical flows as dynamical systems: the influence of Hide's experiments. Astronomy & Geophysics. 2010;51 (4) :4–28.

.
Unified Notation for Data Assimilation: Operational, Sequential and Variational. Journal of Meteorological Society of Japan. 1997;75 (1B) :181–189.

.
Data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography. Advances in Geophysics. 1991;33 :141–266.

.